Thread:Drew1200/@comment-4845243-20140415153829

I had an idea that could be important for improving this wiki: having groups of users called reviewers. Reviewers would carry out a process over a few steps:

1) They read the text that a commentary is intended to explain.

2) They compile questions regarding that text that they think will be helpful to understanding it.

3) They read the commentary.

4) They see how well the commentary answers their questions, and they compile any questions that the commentary raises, or any unclear parts of the commentary.

5) They post their findings for the commentator, who can then use them to improve his/her commentary.

I think this process would really help us to have high quality commentary, as it can be difficult for a single person to include everything that is important about a text on their first go at a commentary. 